llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
llama-4-maverickvsminimax-m2.7
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m2.7
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
minimax-m2.7
180,000 tokens
Input formats
llama-4-maverick
text, image
minimax-m2.7
text
Vision
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
minimax-m2.7
Not supported
Streaming
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
minimax-m2.7
Not supported
JSON mode
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
minimax-m2.7Better fit
Supported
Reasoning
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
minimax-m2.7Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
llama-4-maverick · leads in 15
40%
Weak
minimax-m2.7 · leads in 14
41%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
llama-4-maverickLeads60%minimax-m2.727%Logical reasoning
llama-4-maverick26%minimax-m2.7Leads42%Mathematics
llama-4-maverick36%minimax-m2.7Leads40%Scientific and technical depth
llama-4-maverickLeads45%minimax-m2.729%Planning and task decomposition
llama-4-maverick25%minimax-m2.7Leads44%
Coding & tools
Code generation
llama-4-maverickLeads36%minimax-m2.730%Debugging and code review
llama-4-maverick33%minimax-m2.7Leads37%Agentic coding
llama-4-maverick34%minimax-m2.7Leads46%Tool and function calling
llama-4-maverick36%minimax-m2.7Leads44%SQL and query writing
llama-4-maverick34%minimax-m2.7Leads37%
Writing & language
Creative writing
llama-4-maverickLeads48%minimax-m2.730%Professional writing
llama-4-maverickLeads39%minimax-m2.730%Conversational quality
llama-4-maverickLeads38%minimax-m2.736%Multilingual ability
llama-4-maverickLeads62%minimax-m2.760%Translation
llama-4-maverickLeads47%minimax-m2.742%Summarization
llama-4-maverickLeads57%minimax-m2.731%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
llama-4-maverickLeads38%minimax-m2.736%Professional domains
llama-4-maverickLeads41%minimax-m2.728%Information extraction
llama-4-maverick27%minimax-m2.7Leads42%Classification and labeling
llama-4-maverickLeads49%minimax-m2.743%Long-context handling
llama-4-maverickLeads89%minimax-m2.735%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
llama-4-maverick19%minimax-m2.7Leads39%Structured output
llama-4-maverick7%minimax-m2.7Leads47%Factual accuracy
llama-4-maverickLeads44%minimax-m2.731%Safety and alignment
llama-4-maverickLeads41%minimax-m2.730%Steerability
llama-4-maverick31%minimax-m2.7Leads37%Output consistency
llama-4-maverick41%minimax-m2.7Leads48%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
llama-4-maverick45%minimax-m2.7Leads72%Cost efficiency
llama-4-maverick46%minimax-m2.7Leads87%Image understanding
llama-4-maverick25%minimax-m2.7No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
minimax-m2.7
89.62%
Average response time
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
minimax-m2.7
22,830.99 ms
P95 API latency
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
minimax-m2.7
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 100%minimax-m2.7: 92.9%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 4,572 msminimax-m2.7: 19,194 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 5,000 msminimax-m2.7: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- llama-4-maverick recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.