grok-4.7
Chat comparison
grok-4.7vsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
grok-4.7
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
grok-4.7
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
grok-4.7Better fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Reasoning
grok-4.7Better fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
grok-4.7 · leads in 25
59%
Moderate
llama-4-maverick · leads in 3
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
grok-4.7Leads66%llama-4-maverick60%Logical reasoning
grok-4.7Leads69%llama-4-maverick26%Mathematics
grok-4.7Leads77%llama-4-maverick36%Scientific and technical depth
grok-4.7Leads68%llama-4-maverick45%Planning and task decomposition
grok-4.7Leads67%llama-4-maverick25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
grok-4.7Leads61%llama-4-maverick36%Debugging and code review
grok-4.7Leads69%llama-4-maverick33%Agentic coding
grok-4.7Leads71%llama-4-maverick34%Tool and function calling
grok-4.7Leads68%llama-4-maverick36%SQL and query writing
grok-4.7Leads65%llama-4-maverick34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
grok-4.7Leads60%llama-4-maverick48%Professional writing
grok-4.7Leads57%llama-4-maverick39%Conversational quality
grok-4.7Leads58%llama-4-maverick38%Multilingual ability
grok-4.737%llama-4-maverickLeads62%Translation
grok-4.7Leads53%llama-4-maverick47%Summarization
grok-4.742%llama-4-maverickLeads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
grok-4.7Leads61%llama-4-maverick38%Professional domains
grok-4.7Leads58%llama-4-maverick41%Information extraction
grok-4.7Leads63%llama-4-maverick27%Classification and labeling
grok-4.7Leads69%llama-4-maverick49%Long-context handling
grok-4.720%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
grok-4.7Leads59%llama-4-maverick19%Structured output
grok-4.7Leads62%llama-4-maverick7%Factual accuracy
grok-4.7Leads51%llama-4-maverick44%Safety and alignment
grok-4.741%llama-4-maverick41%Steerability
grok-4.7Leads58%llama-4-maverick31%Output consistency
grok-4.7Leads56%llama-4-maverick41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
grok-4.7Leads54%llama-4-maverick45%Cost efficiency
grok-4.7Leads74%llama-4-maverick46%Image understanding
grok-4.7No image inputllama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
grok-4.7
33.33%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
grok-4.7
101,699.33 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.