LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Z.ai logo

glm-5.3vsllama-4-maverick

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

llama-4-maverick

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

glm-5.3

1,000,000 tokens

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

1,048,576 tokens

Input formats

glm-5.3

text

llama-4-maverick

text, image

Vision

glm-5.3

Not supported

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

Supported

JSON mode

glm-5.3Better fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Reasoning

glm-5.3Better fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

glm-5.3 · leads in 24

58%

Moderate

llama-4-maverick · leads in 5

40%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    glm-5.353%
    llama-4-maverickLeads60%
  • Logical reasoning

    glm-5.3Leads61%
    llama-4-maverick26%
  • Mathematics

    glm-5.3Leads66%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    glm-5.3Leads59%
    llama-4-maverick45%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    glm-5.3Leads61%
    llama-4-maverick25%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    glm-5.3Leads50%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • Debugging and code review

    glm-5.3Leads61%
    llama-4-maverick33%
  • Agentic coding

    glm-5.3Leads64%
    llama-4-maverick34%
  • Tool and function calling

    glm-5.3Leads57%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • SQL and query writing

    glm-5.3Leads65%
    llama-4-maverick34%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    glm-5.347%
    llama-4-maverickLeads48%
  • Professional writing

    glm-5.3Leads54%
    llama-4-maverick39%
  • Conversational quality

    glm-5.3Leads51%
    llama-4-maverick38%
  • Multilingual ability

    glm-5.3Leads86%
    llama-4-maverick62%
  • Translation

    glm-5.3Leads64%
    llama-4-maverick47%
  • Summarization

    glm-5.3Leads60%
    llama-4-maverick57%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    glm-5.3Leads64%
    llama-4-maverick38%
  • Professional domains

    glm-5.3Leads56%
    llama-4-maverick41%
  • Information extraction

    glm-5.3Leads62%
    llama-4-maverick27%
  • Classification and labeling

    glm-5.3Leads63%
    llama-4-maverick49%
  • Long-context handling

    glm-5.375%
    llama-4-maverickLeads89%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    glm-5.3Leads55%
    llama-4-maverick19%
  • Structured output

    glm-5.3Leads60%
    llama-4-maverick7%
  • Factual accuracy

    glm-5.3Leads53%
    llama-4-maverick44%
  • Safety and alignment

    glm-5.3Leads47%
    llama-4-maverick41%
  • Steerability

    glm-5.3Leads53%
    llama-4-maverick31%
  • Output consistency

    glm-5.3Leads60%
    llama-4-maverick41%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    glm-5.334%
    llama-4-maverickLeads45%
  • Cost efficiency

    glm-5.336%
    llama-4-maverickLeads46%
  • Image understanding

    glm-5.3No image input
    llama-4-maverick25%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

glm-5.3

98.84%

llama-4-maverick

95.34%

Average response time

glm-5.3

20,395.48 ms

llama-4-maverick

4,496.14 ms

P95 API latency

glm-5.3

60,000 ms

llama-4-maverick

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.3: 100%llama-4-maverick: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.3: 5,597 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.3: 10,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
  • llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
  • glm-5.3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring