glm-5.3
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.3vskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.3Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
kimi-k2.6
262,000 tokens
Input formats
glm-5.3
text
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
glm-5.3 · leads in 21
58%
Moderate
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 5
54%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
glm-5.3Leads53%kimi-k2.647%Logical reasoning
glm-5.3Leads61%kimi-k2.660%Mathematics
glm-5.366%kimi-k2.6Leads67%Scientific and technical depth
glm-5.3Leads59%kimi-k2.653%Planning and task decomposition
glm-5.3Leads61%kimi-k2.659%
Coding & tools
Code generation
glm-5.350%kimi-k2.650%Debugging and code review
glm-5.3Leads61%kimi-k2.658%Agentic coding
glm-5.3Leads64%kimi-k2.660%Tool and function calling
glm-5.3Leads57%kimi-k2.656%SQL and query writing
glm-5.3Leads65%kimi-k2.659%
Writing & language
Creative writing
glm-5.3Leads47%kimi-k2.644%Professional writing
glm-5.3Leads54%kimi-k2.649%Conversational quality
glm-5.351%kimi-k2.651%Multilingual ability
glm-5.3Leads86%kimi-k2.665%Translation
glm-5.3Leads64%kimi-k2.657%Summarization
glm-5.3Leads60%kimi-k2.654%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
glm-5.3Leads64%kimi-k2.662%Professional domains
glm-5.3Leads56%kimi-k2.650%Information extraction
glm-5.362%kimi-k2.6Leads64%Classification and labeling
glm-5.3Leads63%kimi-k2.655%Long-context handling
glm-5.3Leads75%kimi-k2.654%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
glm-5.355%kimi-k2.655%Structured output
glm-5.360%kimi-k2.6Leads67%Factual accuracy
glm-5.3Leads53%kimi-k2.651%Safety and alignment
glm-5.3Leads47%kimi-k2.643%Steerability
glm-5.3Leads53%kimi-k2.648%Output consistency
glm-5.3Leads60%kimi-k2.656%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
glm-5.334%kimi-k2.6Leads37%Cost efficiency
glm-5.336%kimi-k2.6Leads47%Image understanding
glm-5.3No image inputkimi-k2.6No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.3
98.84%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
glm-5.3
20,395.48 ms
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.3
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.3: 100%kimi-k2.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.3: 5,597 mskimi-k2.6: 16,670 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.3: 10,000 mskimi-k2.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.3 has a larger context window.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.