gpt-5.6-terra
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-terravskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
kimi-k2.6
262,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-5.6-terra
text, image
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Vision
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
Supported
kimi-k2.6
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-terra
92.52%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-terra
30,772.16 ms
kimi-k2.6
4,259.5 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-terra has a larger context window.
- gpt-5.6-terra supports image input while the other model does not.