gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsgpt-5.6-terra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gemini-3.1-pro
text
gpt-5.6-terra
text, image
Vision
gemini-3.1-pro
Not supported
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 2
69%
Moderate
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 27
83%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-pro73%gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-pro69%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-pro76%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-pro76%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-pro67%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-pro64%gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-pro69%gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-pro69%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-pro73%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-pro73%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-pro61%gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-pro67%gpt-5.6-terraLeads84%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-pro67%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%gpt-5.6-terra81%Translation
gemini-3.1-pro78%gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%Summarization
gemini-3.1-pro55%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-pro75%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-pro70%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-pro72%gpt-5.6-terraLeads91%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-pro79%gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-pro40%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-pro67%gpt-5.6-terraLeads83%Structured output
gemini-3.1-pro77%gpt-5.6-terraLeads89%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-pro75%gpt-5.6-terraLeads82%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-pro69%gpt-5.6-terraLeads74%Steerability
gemini-3.1-pro62%gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-pro76%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-proLeads47%gpt-5.6-terra44%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-pro54%gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputgpt-5.6-terra59%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
gpt-5.6-terra
93.73%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
29,135.19 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%gpt-5.6-terra: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msgpt-5.6-terra: 17,864 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msgpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-terra supports image input while the other model does not.
- gpt-5.6-terra recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.