LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

OpenAI logo

gpt-5.6-terravsL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Hugging Face logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gpt-5.6-terra

Checking current pricing…

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit

1,000,000 tokens

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

8,000 tokens

Input formats

gpt-5.6-terra

text, image

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

text

Vision

gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit

Supported

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Not supported

Tool calling

gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit

Supported

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Not supported

JSON mode

gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit

Supported

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Not supported

Reasoning

gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit

Supported

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 28

83%

Strong

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo · leads in 1

13%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo10%
  • Logical reasoning

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • Mathematics

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo11%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo4%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Debugging and code review

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo8%
  • Agentic coding

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo2%
  • Tool and function calling

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • SQL and query writing

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo8%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo12%
  • Professional writing

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads84%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Conversational quality

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • Multilingual ability

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo17%
  • Translation

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Summarization

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo4%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Professional domains

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • Information extraction

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads91%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Classification and labeling

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo13%
  • Long-context handling

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo7%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads83%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Structured output

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads89%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Factual accuracy

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads82%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo12%
  • Safety and alignment

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads74%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo11%
  • Steerability

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo10%
  • Output consistency

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo43%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gpt-5.6-terra44%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboLeads80%
  • Cost efficiency

    gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo53%
  • Image understanding

    gpt-5.6-terra59%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gpt-5.6-terra

93.73%

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

100%

Average response time

gpt-5.6-terra

29,135.19 ms

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

1,838.75 ms

P95 API latency

gpt-5.6-terra

60,000 ms

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

5,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gpt-5.6-terra: 100%L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gpt-5.6-terra: 17,864 msL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo: 4,883 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 msL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo: 5,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gpt-5.6-terra has a larger context window.
  • gpt-5.6-terra supports image input while the other model does not.

Keep exploring