gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-terravsgrok-4.7
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
grok-4.7
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-5.6-terra
text, image
grok-4.7
text
Vision
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
Supported
grok-4.7
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 27
83%
Strong
grok-4.7 · leads in 2
59%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%grok-4.766%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%grok-4.769%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%grok-4.777%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%grok-4.768%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%grok-4.767%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%grok-4.761%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%grok-4.769%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%grok-4.771%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%grok-4.768%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%grok-4.765%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%grok-4.760%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-terraLeads84%grok-4.757%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%grok-4.758%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%grok-4.737%Translation
gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%grok-4.753%Summarization
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%grok-4.742%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%grok-4.761%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%grok-4.758%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-terraLeads91%grok-4.763%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%grok-4.769%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%grok-4.720%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-terraLeads83%grok-4.759%Structured output
gpt-5.6-terraLeads89%grok-4.762%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-terraLeads82%grok-4.751%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-terraLeads74%grok-4.741%Steerability
gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%grok-4.758%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%grok-4.756%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-terra44%grok-4.7Leads54%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-terra66%grok-4.7Leads74%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-terra59%grok-4.7No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-terra
93.73%
grok-4.7
33.33%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-terra
29,135.19 ms
grok-4.7
101,699.33 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-terra supports image input while the other model does not.