claude-fable-5-1
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-fable-5-1vsgpt-5.6-terra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-fable-5-1 · leads in 27
93%
Strong
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 3
83%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra92%Logical reasoning
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra87%Mathematics
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra90%Scientific and technical depth
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra87%Planning and task decomposition
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra85%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-fable-5-1Leads89%gpt-5.6-terra81%Debugging and code review
claude-fable-5-1Leads99%gpt-5.6-terra88%Agentic coding
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra90%Tool and function calling
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra87%SQL and query writing
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra90%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra80%Professional writing
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra84%Conversational quality
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra85%Multilingual ability
claude-fable-5-1Leads86%gpt-5.6-terra81%Translation
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra88%Summarization
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra85%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra90%Professional domains
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra85%Information extraction
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra91%Classification and labeling
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra96%Long-context handling
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra83%Structured output
claude-fable-5-1Leads98%gpt-5.6-terra89%Factual accuracy
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra82%Safety and alignment
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra74%Steerability
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra80%Output consistency
claude-fable-5-183%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-fable-5-110%gpt-5.6-terraLeads44%Cost efficiency
claude-fable-5-116%gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%Image understanding
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-5.6-terra59%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-fable-5-1
91.94%
gpt-5.6-terra
94.68%
Average response time
claude-fable-5-1
7,506.65 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
30,254.49 ms
P95 API latency
claude-fable-5-1
30,000 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5-1: 87.5%gpt-5.6-terra: 77.5%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5-1: 3,224 msgpt-5.6-terra: 35,129 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5-1: 10,000 msgpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-terra recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- claude-fable-5-1 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.