DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashvsglm-5.3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
Checking current pricing…
glm-5.3
Checking current pricing…
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
96.78%
glm-5.3
91.84%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
4,484.83 ms
glm-5.3
12,437.7 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
30,000 ms
glm-5.3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 98.4%glm-5.3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 8,962 msglm-5.3: 27,974 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 30,000 msglm-5.3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.