L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Chat comparison
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbovsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
8,000 tokens
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
Input formats
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
Tool calling
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo · leads in 3
13%
Weak
llama-4-maverick · leads in 26
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo10%llama-4-maverickLeads60%Logical reasoning
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%llama-4-maverickLeads26%Mathematics
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo11%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Scientific and technical depth
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%llama-4-maverickLeads45%Planning and task decomposition
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo4%llama-4-maverickLeads25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Debugging and code review
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo8%llama-4-maverickLeads33%Agentic coding
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo2%llama-4-maverickLeads34%Tool and function calling
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%llama-4-maverickLeads36%SQL and query writing
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo8%llama-4-maverickLeads34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo12%llama-4-maverickLeads48%Professional writing
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%llama-4-maverickLeads39%Conversational quality
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Multilingual ability
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo17%llama-4-maverickLeads62%Translation
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%llama-4-maverickLeads47%Summarization
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo4%llama-4-maverickLeads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Professional domains
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Information extraction
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%llama-4-maverickLeads27%Classification and labeling
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo13%llama-4-maverickLeads49%Long-context handling
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo7%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%llama-4-maverickLeads19%Structured output
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%llama-4-maverickLeads7%Factual accuracy
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo12%llama-4-maverickLeads44%Safety and alignment
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo11%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Steerability
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo10%llama-4-maverickLeads31%Output consistency
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboLeads43%llama-4-maverick41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboLeads80%llama-4-maverick45%Cost efficiency
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboLeads53%llama-4-maverick46%Image understanding
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboNo image inputllama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
100%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
1,838.75 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
P95 API latency
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
5,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.