llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
llama-4-maverickvsmuse-spark-1.3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
muse-spark-1.3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
llama-4-maverick
text, image
muse-spark-1.3
text
Vision
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
muse-spark-1.3
Not supported
JSON mode
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
muse-spark-1.3Better fit
Supported
Reasoning
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
muse-spark-1.3Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
llama-4-maverick · leads in 20
40%
Weak
muse-spark-1.3 · leads in 8
29%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
llama-4-maverickLeads60%muse-spark-1.316%Logical reasoning
llama-4-maverick26%muse-spark-1.3Leads35%Mathematics
llama-4-maverickLeads36%muse-spark-1.329%Scientific and technical depth
llama-4-maverickLeads45%muse-spark-1.323%Planning and task decomposition
llama-4-maverick25%muse-spark-1.3Leads39%
Coding & tools
Code generation
llama-4-maverickLeads36%muse-spark-1.324%Debugging and code review
llama-4-maverick33%muse-spark-1.333%Agentic coding
llama-4-maverick34%muse-spark-1.3Leads42%Tool and function calling
llama-4-maverick36%muse-spark-1.3Leads37%SQL and query writing
llama-4-maverickLeads34%muse-spark-1.331%
Writing & language
Creative writing
llama-4-maverickLeads48%muse-spark-1.332%Professional writing
llama-4-maverickLeads39%muse-spark-1.326%Conversational quality
llama-4-maverickLeads38%muse-spark-1.321%Multilingual ability
llama-4-maverickLeads62%muse-spark-1.326%Translation
llama-4-maverickLeads47%muse-spark-1.322%Summarization
llama-4-maverickLeads57%muse-spark-1.313%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
llama-4-maverickLeads38%muse-spark-1.328%Professional domains
llama-4-maverickLeads41%muse-spark-1.324%Information extraction
llama-4-maverick27%muse-spark-1.3Leads30%Classification and labeling
llama-4-maverickLeads49%muse-spark-1.329%Long-context handling
llama-4-maverickLeads89%muse-spark-1.36%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
llama-4-maverick19%muse-spark-1.3Leads30%Structured output
llama-4-maverick7%muse-spark-1.3Leads40%Factual accuracy
llama-4-maverickLeads44%muse-spark-1.320%Safety and alignment
llama-4-maverickLeads41%muse-spark-1.325%Steerability
llama-4-maverickLeads31%muse-spark-1.330%Output consistency
llama-4-maverickLeads41%muse-spark-1.337%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
llama-4-maverickLeads45%muse-spark-1.344%Cost efficiency
llama-4-maverick46%muse-spark-1.3Leads55%Image understanding
llama-4-maverick25%muse-spark-1.3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
muse-spark-1.3
0%
Average response time
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
muse-spark-1.3
117,086.75 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 4,572 msmuse-spark-1.3: 263,946 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.