gpt-5.6-luna
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-lunavsmuse-spark-1.3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
muse-spark-1.3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-5.6-luna
text, image
muse-spark-1.3
text
Vision
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
muse-spark-1.3
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-luna · leads in 29
79%
Moderate
muse-spark-1.3 · leads in 0
29%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads89%muse-spark-1.316%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%muse-spark-1.335%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%muse-spark-1.329%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%muse-spark-1.323%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%muse-spark-1.339%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%muse-spark-1.324%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%muse-spark-1.333%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%muse-spark-1.342%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads85%muse-spark-1.337%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%muse-spark-1.331%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%muse-spark-1.332%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%muse-spark-1.326%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%muse-spark-1.321%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads77%muse-spark-1.326%Translation
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads84%muse-spark-1.322%Summarization
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads64%muse-spark-1.313%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%muse-spark-1.328%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads80%muse-spark-1.324%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%muse-spark-1.330%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads95%muse-spark-1.329%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads32%muse-spark-1.36%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%muse-spark-1.330%Structured output
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads87%muse-spark-1.340%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%muse-spark-1.320%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads72%muse-spark-1.325%Steerability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%muse-spark-1.330%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads88%muse-spark-1.337%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads59%muse-spark-1.344%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads94%muse-spark-1.355%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-luna53%muse-spark-1.3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-luna
82.59%
muse-spark-1.3
0%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-luna
57,896.19 ms
muse-spark-1.3
117,086.75 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 99,082 msmuse-spark-1.3: 263,946 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-luna supports image input while the other model does not.