LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3.1-provsllama-4-maverick

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3.1-pro

Checking current pricing…

llama-4-maverick

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

gemini-3.1-pro

text

llama-4-maverick

text, image

Vision

gemini-3.1-pro

Not supported

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

Supported

JSON mode

gemini-3.1-proBetter fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Reasoning

gemini-3.1-proBetter fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 27

69%

Moderate

llama-4-maverick · leads in 2

40%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemini-3.1-proLeads73%
    llama-4-maverick60%

  • Logical reasoning

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    llama-4-maverick26%

  • Mathematics

    gemini-3.1-proLeads76%
    llama-4-maverick36%

  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemini-3.1-proLeads76%
    llama-4-maverick45%

  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    llama-4-maverick25%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemini-3.1-proLeads64%
    llama-4-maverick36%

  • Debugging and code review

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    llama-4-maverick33%

  • Agentic coding

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    llama-4-maverick34%

  • Tool and function calling

    gemini-3.1-proLeads73%
    llama-4-maverick36%

  • SQL and query writing

    gemini-3.1-proLeads73%
    llama-4-maverick34%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemini-3.1-proLeads61%
    llama-4-maverick48%

  • Professional writing

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    llama-4-maverick39%

  • Conversational quality

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    llama-4-maverick38%

  • Multilingual ability

    gemini-3.1-proLeads98%
    llama-4-maverick62%

  • Translation

    gemini-3.1-proLeads78%
    llama-4-maverick47%

  • Summarization

    gemini-3.1-pro55%
    llama-4-maverickLeads57%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemini-3.1-proLeads75%
    llama-4-maverick38%

  • Professional domains

    gemini-3.1-proLeads70%
    llama-4-maverick41%

  • Information extraction

    gemini-3.1-proLeads72%
    llama-4-maverick27%

  • Classification and labeling

    gemini-3.1-proLeads79%
    llama-4-maverick49%

  • Long-context handling

    gemini-3.1-pro40%
    llama-4-maverickLeads89%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    llama-4-maverick19%

  • Structured output

    gemini-3.1-proLeads77%
    llama-4-maverick7%

  • Factual accuracy

    gemini-3.1-proLeads75%
    llama-4-maverick44%

  • Safety and alignment

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    llama-4-maverick41%

  • Steerability

    gemini-3.1-proLeads62%
    llama-4-maverick31%

  • Output consistency

    gemini-3.1-proLeads76%
    llama-4-maverick41%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemini-3.1-proLeads47%
    llama-4-maverick45%

  • Cost efficiency

    gemini-3.1-proLeads54%
    llama-4-maverick46%

  • Image understanding

    gemini-3.1-proNo image input
    llama-4-maverick25%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3.1-pro

89.68%

llama-4-maverick

95.34%

Average response time

gemini-3.1-pro

39,780.78 ms

llama-4-maverick

4,496.14 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3.1-pro

60,000 ms

llama-4-maverick

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%llama-4-maverick: 100%
22 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
  • llama-4-maverick recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring

About gemini-3.1-proAbout llama-4-maverickgemini-3.1-pro vs mistral-large-3:675bclaude-opus-5-5 vs gemini-3.1-proanthropic/claude-sonnet-5 vs gemini-3.1-progpt-6-sol vs llama-4-maverickInkling-Small vs llama-4-maverickclaude-opus-5 vs llama-4-maverick