Inkling-Small
Chat comparison
Inkling-Smallvsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
Inkling-Small
512,000 tokens
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
Input formats
Inkling-Small
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
Inkling-Small
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
Inkling-SmallBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Reasoning
Inkling-SmallBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Inkling-Small · leads in 7
28%
Weak
llama-4-maverick · leads in 22
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
Inkling-Small12%llama-4-maverickLeads60%Logical reasoning
Inkling-SmallLeads33%llama-4-maverick26%Mathematics
Inkling-Small25%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Scientific and technical depth
Inkling-Small21%llama-4-maverickLeads45%Planning and task decomposition
Inkling-SmallLeads36%llama-4-maverick25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
Inkling-Small21%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Debugging and code review
Inkling-Small31%llama-4-maverickLeads33%Agentic coding
Inkling-SmallLeads41%llama-4-maverick34%Tool and function calling
Inkling-Small33%llama-4-maverickLeads36%SQL and query writing
Inkling-Small27%llama-4-maverickLeads34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
Inkling-Small26%llama-4-maverickLeads48%Professional writing
Inkling-Small23%llama-4-maverickLeads39%Conversational quality
Inkling-Small19%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Multilingual ability
Inkling-Small13%llama-4-maverickLeads62%Translation
Inkling-Small18%llama-4-maverickLeads47%Summarization
Inkling-Small28%llama-4-maverickLeads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
Inkling-Small30%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Professional domains
Inkling-Small24%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Information extraction
Inkling-SmallLeads30%llama-4-maverick27%Classification and labeling
Inkling-Small25%llama-4-maverickLeads49%Long-context handling
Inkling-Small49%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
Inkling-SmallLeads26%llama-4-maverick19%Structured output
Inkling-SmallLeads37%llama-4-maverick7%Factual accuracy
Inkling-Small17%llama-4-maverickLeads44%Safety and alignment
Inkling-Small20%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Steerability
Inkling-Small26%llama-4-maverickLeads31%Output consistency
Inkling-Small38%llama-4-maverickLeads41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
Inkling-SmallLeads54%llama-4-maverick45%Cost efficiency
Inkling-Small31%llama-4-maverickLeads46%Image understanding
Inkling-SmallNo image inputllama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
Inkling-Small
100%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
Inkling-Small
1,109 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
P95 API latency
Inkling-Small
2,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.