llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
llama-4-maverickvsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Input formats
llama-4-maverick
text, image
seed-2.0-mini
text
Vision
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
JSON mode
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
seed-2.0-miniBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
llama-4-maverick · leads in 25
40%
Weak
seed-2.0-mini · leads in 4
21%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
llama-4-maverickLeads60%seed-2.0-mini14%Logical reasoning
llama-4-maverickLeads26%seed-2.0-mini8%Mathematics
llama-4-maverickLeads36%seed-2.0-mini12%Scientific and technical depth
llama-4-maverickLeads45%seed-2.0-mini11%Planning and task decomposition
llama-4-maverickLeads25%seed-2.0-mini11%
Coding & tools
Code generation
llama-4-maverickLeads36%seed-2.0-mini15%Debugging and code review
llama-4-maverickLeads33%seed-2.0-mini13%Agentic coding
llama-4-maverickLeads34%seed-2.0-mini21%Tool and function calling
llama-4-maverickLeads36%seed-2.0-mini23%SQL and query writing
llama-4-maverickLeads34%seed-2.0-mini16%
Writing & language
Creative writing
llama-4-maverickLeads48%seed-2.0-mini12%Professional writing
llama-4-maverickLeads39%seed-2.0-mini15%Conversational quality
llama-4-maverickLeads38%seed-2.0-mini10%Multilingual ability
llama-4-maverickLeads62%seed-2.0-mini16%Translation
llama-4-maverickLeads47%seed-2.0-mini13%Summarization
llama-4-maverickLeads57%seed-2.0-mini19%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
llama-4-maverickLeads38%seed-2.0-mini16%Professional domains
llama-4-maverickLeads41%seed-2.0-mini12%Information extraction
llama-4-maverickLeads27%seed-2.0-mini24%Classification and labeling
llama-4-maverickLeads49%seed-2.0-mini23%Long-context handling
llama-4-maverickLeads89%seed-2.0-mini33%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
llama-4-maverickLeads19%seed-2.0-mini17%Structured output
llama-4-maverick7%seed-2.0-miniLeads38%Factual accuracy
llama-4-maverickLeads44%seed-2.0-mini16%Safety and alignment
llama-4-maverickLeads41%seed-2.0-mini17%Steerability
llama-4-maverickLeads31%seed-2.0-mini14%Output consistency
llama-4-maverick41%seed-2.0-miniLeads52%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
llama-4-maverick45%seed-2.0-miniLeads68%Cost efficiency
llama-4-maverick46%seed-2.0-miniLeads48%Image understanding
llama-4-maverick25%seed-2.0-miniNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
seed-2.0-mini
6,796.87 ms
P95 API latency
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 100%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 4,572 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 5,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- seed-2.0-mini recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.