LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8vsllama-4-maverick

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

llama-4-maverick

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

text, image, json

llama-4-maverick

text, image

JSON mode

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Reasoning

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 27

84%

Strong

llama-4-maverick · leads in 3

40%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    llama-4-maverick60%
  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    llama-4-maverick26%
  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    llama-4-maverick45%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    llama-4-maverick25%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads82%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    llama-4-maverick33%
  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    llama-4-maverick34%
  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    llama-4-maverick34%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    llama-4-maverick48%
  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    llama-4-maverick39%
  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    llama-4-maverick38%
  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads73%
    llama-4-maverick62%
  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    llama-4-maverick47%
  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%
    llama-4-maverick57%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    llama-4-maverick38%
  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads94%
    llama-4-maverick41%
  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    llama-4-maverick27%
  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%
    llama-4-maverick49%
  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-858%
    llama-4-maverickLeads89%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    llama-4-maverick19%
  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads99%
    llama-4-maverick7%
  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads98%
    llama-4-maverick44%
  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads96%
    llama-4-maverick41%
  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    llama-4-maverick31%
  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads97%
    llama-4-maverick41%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-811%
    llama-4-maverickLeads45%
  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-818%
    llama-4-maverickLeads46%
  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads79%
    llama-4-maverick25%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

97.2%

llama-4-maverick

95.34%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

7,987.25 ms

llama-4-maverick

4,496.14 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

30,000 ms

llama-4-maverick

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 97%llama-4-maverick: 100%
22 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 8,328 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 30,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring