gpt-oss:20b
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-oss:20bvsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-oss:20b
128,000 tokens
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
Input formats
gpt-oss:20b
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
gpt-oss:20b
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
gpt-oss:20bBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-oss:20b · leads in 6
30%
Weak
llama-4-maverick · leads in 23
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-oss:20b26%llama-4-maverickLeads60%Logical reasoning
gpt-oss:20b14%llama-4-maverickLeads26%Mathematics
gpt-oss:20b23%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-oss:20b24%llama-4-maverickLeads45%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-oss:20b15%llama-4-maverickLeads25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-oss:20b32%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Debugging and code review
gpt-oss:20b26%llama-4-maverickLeads33%Agentic coding
gpt-oss:20b26%llama-4-maverickLeads34%Tool and function calling
gpt-oss:20b30%llama-4-maverickLeads36%SQL and query writing
gpt-oss:20b27%llama-4-maverickLeads34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-oss:20b26%llama-4-maverickLeads48%Professional writing
gpt-oss:20b24%llama-4-maverickLeads39%Conversational quality
gpt-oss:20b21%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Multilingual ability
gpt-oss:20b28%llama-4-maverickLeads62%Translation
gpt-oss:20b25%llama-4-maverickLeads47%Summarization
gpt-oss:20b21%llama-4-maverickLeads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-oss:20b22%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Professional domains
gpt-oss:20b19%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Information extraction
gpt-oss:20bLeads30%llama-4-maverick27%Classification and labeling
gpt-oss:20b31%llama-4-maverickLeads49%Long-context handling
gpt-oss:20b26%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-oss:20bLeads23%llama-4-maverick19%Structured output
gpt-oss:20bLeads46%llama-4-maverick7%Factual accuracy
gpt-oss:20b25%llama-4-maverickLeads44%Safety and alignment
gpt-oss:20b24%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Steerability
gpt-oss:20b23%llama-4-maverickLeads31%Output consistency
gpt-oss:20bLeads51%llama-4-maverick41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-oss:20bLeads69%llama-4-maverick45%Cost efficiency
gpt-oss:20bLeads80%llama-4-maverick46%Image understanding
gpt-oss:20bNo image inputllama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-oss:20b
99.11%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
gpt-oss:20b
2,686.07 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-oss:20b
10,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 99.3%llama-4-maverick: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 2,509 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 10,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.