LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8vsminimax-m2.7

MiniMax logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

text, image, json

minimax-m2.7

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

minimax-m2.7

Not supported

Streaming

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

minimax-m2.7

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 27

84%

Strong

minimax-m2.7 · leads in 2

41%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    minimax-m2.727%

  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    minimax-m2.742%

  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    minimax-m2.740%

  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    minimax-m2.729%

  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    minimax-m2.744%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads82%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    minimax-m2.737%

  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    minimax-m2.746%

  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    minimax-m2.744%

  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    minimax-m2.737%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    minimax-m2.736%

  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads73%
    minimax-m2.760%

  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    minimax-m2.742%

  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%
    minimax-m2.731%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    minimax-m2.736%

  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads94%
    minimax-m2.728%

  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    minimax-m2.742%

  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%
    minimax-m2.743%

  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads58%
    minimax-m2.735%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    minimax-m2.739%

  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads99%
    minimax-m2.747%

  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads98%
    minimax-m2.731%

  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads96%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    minimax-m2.737%

  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads97%
    minimax-m2.748%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-811%
    minimax-m2.7Leads72%

  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-818%
    minimax-m2.7Leads87%

  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-879%
    minimax-m2.7No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

97.2%

minimax-m2.7

89.62%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

7,987.25 ms

minimax-m2.7

22,830.99 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

30,000 ms

minimax-m2.7

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 97%minimax-m2.7: 92.9%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 8,328 msminimax-m2.7: 19,194 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 30,000 msminimax-m2.7: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring

About anthropic/claude-opus-4-8About minimax-m2.7anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs gpt-oss:20banthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs claude-haiku-4-5anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs claude-opus-5anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs minimax-m2.7claude-opus-5-5 vs minimax-m2.7grok-4.7 vs minimax-m2.7