LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6vsminimax-m2.7

MiniMax logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

text, image, json

minimax-m2.7

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Better fit

Supported

minimax-m2.7

Not supported

Streaming

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Better fit

Supported

minimax-m2.7

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 · leads in 27

82%

Strong

minimax-m2.7 · leads in 2

41%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%
    minimax-m2.727%

  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads89%
    minimax-m2.742%

  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%
    minimax-m2.740%

  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%
    minimax-m2.729%

  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads88%
    minimax-m2.744%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads80%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads88%
    minimax-m2.737%

  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    minimax-m2.746%

  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads90%
    minimax-m2.744%

  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%
    minimax-m2.737%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads90%
    minimax-m2.736%

  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads71%
    minimax-m2.760%

  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    minimax-m2.742%

  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads82%
    minimax-m2.731%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    minimax-m2.736%

  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads92%
    minimax-m2.728%

  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads89%
    minimax-m2.742%

  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads82%
    minimax-m2.743%

  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads56%
    minimax-m2.735%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%
    minimax-m2.739%

  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads97%
    minimax-m2.747%

  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads96%
    minimax-m2.731%

  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads94%
    minimax-m2.730%

  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads93%
    minimax-m2.737%

  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads95%
    minimax-m2.748%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-611%
    minimax-m2.7Leads72%

  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-616%
    minimax-m2.7Leads87%

  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-672%
    minimax-m2.7No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

98.13%

minimax-m2.7

89.62%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

6,959.2 ms

minimax-m2.7

22,830.99 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

30,000 ms

minimax-m2.7

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 98%minimax-m2.7: 92.9%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 7,280 msminimax-m2.7: 19,194 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 30,000 msminimax-m2.7: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring

About anthropic/claude-opus-4-6About minimax-m2.7anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs anthropic/claude-sonnet-5anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs kimi-k2.7-codeanthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs gpt-5.6-solanthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5 vs minimax-m2.7DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs minimax-m2.7gpt-6-sol vs minimax-m2.7