LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

MiniMax logo

minimax-m2.7vsnemotron-3-nano:30b

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

nemotron-3-nano:30b

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

minimax-m2.7

180,000 tokens

nemotron-3-nano:30bBetter fit

1,000,000 tokens

Streaming

minimax-m2.7

Not supported

nemotron-3-nano:30bBetter fit

Supported

JSON mode

minimax-m2.7Better fit

Supported

nemotron-3-nano:30b

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

minimax-m2.7 · leads in 15

41%

Weak

nemotron-3-nano:30b · leads in 13

39%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    minimax-m2.727%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads28%
  • Logical reasoning

    minimax-m2.742%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads44%
  • Mathematics

    minimax-m2.740%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads47%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    minimax-m2.729%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads41%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    minimax-m2.7Leads44%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b43%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    minimax-m2.730%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads35%
  • Debugging and code review

    minimax-m2.737%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads43%
  • Agentic coding

    minimax-m2.746%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads48%
  • Tool and function calling

    minimax-m2.7Leads44%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b37%
  • SQL and query writing

    minimax-m2.737%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads39%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    minimax-m2.7Leads30%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b28%
  • Professional writing

    minimax-m2.7Leads30%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b24%
  • Conversational quality

    minimax-m2.7Leads36%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b29%
  • Multilingual ability

    minimax-m2.7Leads60%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b43%
  • Translation

    minimax-m2.7Leads42%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b35%
  • Summarization

    minimax-m2.731%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads47%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    minimax-m2.736%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads40%
  • Professional domains

    minimax-m2.728%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads29%
  • Information extraction

    minimax-m2.7Leads42%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b25%
  • Classification and labeling

    minimax-m2.743%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b43%
  • Long-context handling

    minimax-m2.735%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads70%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    minimax-m2.7Leads39%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b21%
  • Structured output

    minimax-m2.7Leads47%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b8%
  • Factual accuracy

    minimax-m2.731%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads34%
  • Safety and alignment

    minimax-m2.7Leads30%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b29%
  • Steerability

    minimax-m2.7Leads37%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b31%
  • Output consistency

    minimax-m2.7Leads48%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b40%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    minimax-m2.7Leads72%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b71%
  • Cost efficiency

    minimax-m2.7Leads87%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b80%
  • Image understanding

    minimax-m2.7No image input
    nemotron-3-nano:30bNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

minimax-m2.7

89.62%

nemotron-3-nano:30b

98.3%

Average response time

minimax-m2.7

22,830.99 ms

nemotron-3-nano:30b

3,194.26 ms

P95 API latency

minimax-m2.7

60,000 ms

nemotron-3-nano:30b

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

minimax-m2.7: 92.9%nemotron-3-nano:30b: 99%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

minimax-m2.7: 19,194 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 4,647 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

minimax-m2.7: 60,000 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 10,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • nemotron-3-nano:30b has a larger context window.
  • nemotron-3-nano:30b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • nemotron-3-nano:30b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring