minimax-m2.7
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
minimax-m2.7vsminimax-m3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
minimax-m2.7
180,000 tokens
minimax-m3Better fit
512,000 tokens
Streaming
minimax-m2.7
Not supported
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
minimax-m2.7 · leads in 2
41%
Weak
minimax-m3 · leads in 27
47%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
minimax-m2.727%minimax-m3Leads35%Logical reasoning
minimax-m2.742%minimax-m3Leads50%Mathematics
minimax-m2.740%minimax-m3Leads51%Scientific and technical depth
minimax-m2.729%minimax-m3Leads42%Planning and task decomposition
minimax-m2.744%minimax-m3Leads52%
Coding & tools
Code generation
minimax-m2.730%minimax-m3Leads37%Debugging and code review
minimax-m2.737%minimax-m3Leads47%Agentic coding
minimax-m2.746%minimax-m3Leads55%Tool and function calling
minimax-m2.744%minimax-m3Leads51%SQL and query writing
minimax-m2.737%minimax-m3Leads48%
Writing & language
Creative writing
minimax-m2.730%minimax-m3Leads38%Professional writing
minimax-m2.730%minimax-m3Leads40%Conversational quality
minimax-m2.736%minimax-m3Leads43%Multilingual ability
minimax-m2.760%minimax-m3Leads65%Translation
minimax-m2.742%minimax-m3Leads50%Summarization
minimax-m2.731%minimax-m3Leads48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
minimax-m2.736%minimax-m3Leads50%Professional domains
minimax-m2.728%minimax-m3Leads43%Information extraction
minimax-m2.742%minimax-m3Leads51%Classification and labeling
minimax-m2.743%minimax-m3Leads51%Long-context handling
minimax-m2.735%minimax-m3Leads59%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
minimax-m2.739%minimax-m3Leads46%Structured output
minimax-m2.747%minimax-m3Leads51%Factual accuracy
minimax-m2.731%minimax-m3Leads37%Safety and alignment
minimax-m2.730%minimax-m3Leads35%Steerability
minimax-m2.737%minimax-m3Leads44%Output consistency
minimax-m2.748%minimax-m3Leads50%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
minimax-m2.7Leads72%minimax-m340%Cost efficiency
minimax-m2.7Leads87%minimax-m352%Image understanding
minimax-m2.7No image inputminimax-m3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
minimax-m2.7
89.62%
minimax-m3
99.29%
Average response time
minimax-m2.7
22,830.99 ms
minimax-m3
22,425.83 ms
P95 API latency
minimax-m2.7
60,000 ms
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
minimax-m2.7: 92.9%minimax-m3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
minimax-m2.7: 19,194 msminimax-m3: 27,175 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
minimax-m2.7: 60,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- minimax-m3 has a larger context window.
- minimax-m3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.