gpt-5.6-luna
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-lunavsgpt-5.6-terra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-luna · leads in 2
79%
Moderate
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 28
83%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-luna89%gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-luna83%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-luna86%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-luna81%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-luna83%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-luna78%gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-luna83%gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-luna82%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-luna85%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-luna86%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-luna78%gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-luna82%gpt-5.6-terraLeads84%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-luna83%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-luna77%gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%Translation
gpt-5.6-luna84%gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%Summarization
gpt-5.6-luna64%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-luna81%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-luna80%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-luna86%gpt-5.6-terraLeads91%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-luna95%gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-luna32%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-luna81%gpt-5.6-terraLeads83%Structured output
gpt-5.6-luna87%gpt-5.6-terraLeads89%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-luna79%gpt-5.6-terraLeads82%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-luna72%gpt-5.6-terraLeads74%Steerability
gpt-5.6-luna79%gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-luna88%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads59%gpt-5.6-terra44%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads94%gpt-5.6-terra66%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-luna53%gpt-5.6-terraLeads59%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-luna
82.59%
gpt-5.6-terra
93.73%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-luna
57,896.19 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
29,135.19 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.6-luna
60,000 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 53.1%gpt-5.6-terra: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 99,082 msgpt-5.6-terra: 17,864 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 60,000 msgpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-terra recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.