claude-opus-4-8
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-4-8vsgpt-5.6-terra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 21
85%
Strong
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 8
83%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-4-886%gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-5.6-terra87%Mathematics
claude-opus-4-888%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-5.6-terra87%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-5.6-terra85%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-4-880%gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-5.6-terra88%Agentic coding
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%gpt-5.6-terra90%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-5.6-terra87%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-4-888%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-4-8Leads88%gpt-5.6-terra80%Professional writing
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-5.6-terra84%Conversational quality
claude-opus-4-8Leads90%gpt-5.6-terra85%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-4-877%gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%Translation
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%gpt-5.6-terra88%Summarization
claude-opus-4-8Leads93%gpt-5.6-terra85%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%gpt-5.6-terra90%Professional domains
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-5.6-terra85%Information extraction
claude-opus-4-891%gpt-5.6-terra91%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-4-885%gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%Long-context handling
claude-opus-4-8Leads94%gpt-5.6-terra85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-5.6-terra83%Structured output
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-5.6-terra89%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-4-8Leads95%gpt-5.6-terra82%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%gpt-5.6-terra74%Steerability
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-5.6-terra80%Output consistency
claude-opus-4-8Leads95%gpt-5.6-terra90%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-4-813%gpt-5.6-terraLeads44%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-4-826%gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%Image understanding
claude-opus-4-8Leads78%gpt-5.6-terra59%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-4-8
97.73%
gpt-5.6-terra
94.68%
Average response time
claude-opus-4-8
14,935.78 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
30,254.49 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-4-8
60,000 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 100%gpt-5.6-terra: 77.5%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 45,417 msgpt-5.6-terra: 35,129 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 60,000 msgpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-4-8 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.