claude-opus-4-8
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-4-8vsmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-opus-4-8Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
128,000 tokens
Input formats
claude-opus-4-8
text, image
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
text
Vision
claude-opus-4-8Better fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Tool calling
claude-opus-4-8Better fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Reasoning
claude-opus-4-8Better fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 27
85%
Strong
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 2
34%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-4-8Leads86%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240715%Mathematics
claude-opus-4-8Leads88%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240727%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240723%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-4-8Leads80%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Agentic coding
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-4-8Leads88%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-4-8Leads88%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240728%Professional writing
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Conversational quality
claude-opus-4-8Leads90%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-4-8Leads77%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240765%Translation
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240732%Summarization
claude-opus-4-8Leads93%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240725%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240721%Professional domains
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240718%Information extraction
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-4-8Leads85%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Long-context handling
claude-opus-4-8Leads94%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240729%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240745%Structured output
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240751%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-4-8Leads95%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240733%Steerability
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240739%Output consistency
claude-opus-4-8Leads95%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240771%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-4-813%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads76%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-4-826%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads84%Image understanding
claude-opus-4-878%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-4-8
96.77%
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
99.4%
Average response time
claude-opus-4-8
13,573.98 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
5,547.3 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-4-8
60,000 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 100%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 2,396 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 10,000 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-4-8 has a larger context window.
- claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.
- mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.