LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Moonshot AI logo

kimi-k3vsmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Mistral AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

kimi-k3Better fit

1,000,000 tokens

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

128,000 tokens

Tool calling

kimi-k3Better fit

Supported

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

kimi-k3 · leads in 20

40%

Weak

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 8

34%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    kimi-k3Leads40%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%
  • Logical reasoning

    kimi-k3Leads22%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240715%
  • Mathematics

    kimi-k3Leads39%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240727%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    kimi-k3Leads32%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240723%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    kimi-k3Leads23%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    kimi-k331%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%
  • Debugging and code review

    kimi-k3Leads29%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%
  • Agentic coding

    kimi-k3Leads33%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%
  • Tool and function calling

    kimi-k3Leads35%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%
  • SQL and query writing

    kimi-k335%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    kimi-k3Leads34%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240728%
  • Professional writing

    kimi-k3Leads37%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%
  • Conversational quality

    kimi-k3Leads34%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%
  • Multilingual ability

    kimi-k361%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads65%
  • Translation

    kimi-k3Leads46%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240732%
  • Summarization

    kimi-k3Leads62%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240725%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    kimi-k3Leads43%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240721%
  • Professional domains

    kimi-k3Leads34%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240718%
  • Information extraction

    kimi-k3Leads51%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%
  • Classification and labeling

    kimi-k3Leads41%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%
  • Long-context handling

    kimi-k3Leads85%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240729%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    kimi-k334%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads45%
  • Structured output

    kimi-k350%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads51%
  • Factual accuracy

    kimi-k3Leads40%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%
  • Safety and alignment

    kimi-k3Leads34%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240733%
  • Steerability

    kimi-k329%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads39%
  • Output consistency

    kimi-k348%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads71%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    kimi-k335%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads76%
  • Cost efficiency

    kimi-k339%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads84%
  • Image understanding

    kimi-k3No image input
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

kimi-k3

97.87%

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

99.4%

Average response time

kimi-k3

12,694.11 ms

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

5,547.3 ms

P95 API latency

kimi-k3

60,000 ms

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

kimi-k3: 100%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

kimi-k3: 69,350 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

kimi-k3: 60,000 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • kimi-k3 has a larger context window.
  • mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring