anthropic/claude-opus-4-8
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8vskimi-k3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8
text, image, json
kimi-k3
text
Vision
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Reasoning
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 26
84%
Strong
kimi-k3 · leads in 3
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%kimi-k340%Logical reasoning
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%kimi-k322%Mathematics
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%kimi-k339%Scientific and technical depth
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%kimi-k332%Planning and task decomposition
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%kimi-k323%
Coding & tools
Code generation
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads82%kimi-k331%Debugging and code review
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%kimi-k329%Agentic coding
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%kimi-k333%Tool and function calling
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%kimi-k335%SQL and query writing
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%kimi-k335%
Writing & language
Creative writing
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%kimi-k334%Professional writing
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%kimi-k337%Conversational quality
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%kimi-k334%Multilingual ability
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads73%kimi-k361%Translation
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%kimi-k346%Summarization
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%kimi-k362%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%kimi-k343%Professional domains
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads94%kimi-k334%Information extraction
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%kimi-k351%Classification and labeling
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%kimi-k341%Long-context handling
anthropic/claude-opus-4-858%kimi-k3Leads85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%kimi-k334%Structured output
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads99%kimi-k350%Factual accuracy
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads98%kimi-k340%Safety and alignment
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads96%kimi-k334%Steerability
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads95%kimi-k329%Output consistency
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads97%kimi-k348%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
anthropic/claude-opus-4-811%kimi-k3Leads35%Cost efficiency
anthropic/claude-opus-4-818%kimi-k3Leads39%Image understanding
anthropic/claude-opus-4-879%kimi-k3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8
97.2%
kimi-k3
97.87%
Average response time
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8
7,987.25 ms
kimi-k3
12,694.11 ms
P95 API latency
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8
30,000 ms
kimi-k3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 97%kimi-k3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 8,328 mskimi-k3: 69,350 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 30,000 mskimi-k3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.