gpt-5.6-luna
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-lunavskimi-k2.7-code
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.7-code
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-5.6-luna
text, image
kimi-k2.7-code
text
Vision
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
kimi-k2.7-code
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-luna · leads in 26
79%
Moderate
kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 3
53%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads89%kimi-k2.7-code37%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%kimi-k2.7-code59%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%kimi-k2.7-code68%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%kimi-k2.7-code56%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%kimi-k2.7-code62%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-luna78%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-luna83%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads88%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%kimi-k2.7-code81%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads85%kimi-k2.7-code58%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%kimi-k2.7-code84%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%kimi-k2.7-code36%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%kimi-k2.7-code39%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%kimi-k2.7-code41%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads77%kimi-k2.7-code55%Translation
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads84%kimi-k2.7-code48%Summarization
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads64%kimi-k2.7-code48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%kimi-k2.7-code59%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads80%kimi-k2.7-code43%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%kimi-k2.7-code52%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads95%kimi-k2.7-code44%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-luna32%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%kimi-k2.7-code50%Structured output
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads87%kimi-k2.7-code59%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%kimi-k2.7-code44%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads72%kimi-k2.7-code39%Steerability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%kimi-k2.7-code45%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads88%kimi-k2.7-code53%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads59%kimi-k2.7-code30%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads94%kimi-k2.7-code34%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-luna53%kimi-k2.7-codeNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-luna
82.59%
kimi-k2.7-code
99.83%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-luna
57,896.19 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
6,571.81 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.6-luna
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 53.1%kimi-k2.7-code: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 99,082 mskimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 60,000 mskimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-luna supports image input while the other model does not.
- kimi-k2.7-code recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- kimi-k2.7-code recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.