codestral-latest
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
codestral-latestvsglm-5.2
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
codestral-latest
32,000 tokens
glm-5.2Better fit
976,000 tokens
Reasoning
codestral-latest
Not supported
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
codestral-latest · leads in 4
28%
Weak
glm-5.2 · leads in 25
56%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
codestral-latest9%glm-5.2Leads50%Logical reasoning
codestral-latest10%glm-5.2Leads57%Mathematics
codestral-latest25%glm-5.2Leads62%Scientific and technical depth
codestral-latest15%glm-5.2Leads56%Planning and task decomposition
codestral-latest11%glm-5.2Leads57%
Coding & tools
Code generation
codestral-latestLeads85%glm-5.247%Debugging and code review
codestral-latestLeads60%glm-5.258%Agentic coding
codestral-latest44%glm-5.2Leads61%Tool and function calling
codestral-latest33%glm-5.2Leads55%SQL and query writing
codestral-latest60%glm-5.2Leads63%
Writing & language
Creative writing
codestral-latest7%glm-5.2Leads44%Professional writing
codestral-latest8%glm-5.2Leads51%Conversational quality
codestral-latest7%glm-5.2Leads49%Multilingual ability
codestral-latest32%glm-5.2Leads84%Translation
codestral-latest11%glm-5.2Leads61%Summarization
codestral-latest7%glm-5.2Leads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
codestral-latest13%glm-5.2Leads61%Professional domains
codestral-latest5%glm-5.2Leads53%Information extraction
codestral-latest16%glm-5.2Leads61%Classification and labeling
codestral-latest15%glm-5.2Leads61%Long-context handling
codestral-latest15%glm-5.2Leads67%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
codestral-latest21%glm-5.2Leads53%Structured output
codestral-latest44%glm-5.2Leads60%Factual accuracy
codestral-latest17%glm-5.2Leads50%Safety and alignment
codestral-latest14%glm-5.2Leads45%Steerability
codestral-latest14%glm-5.2Leads49%Output consistency
codestral-latest52%glm-5.2Leads60%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
codestral-latestLeads85%glm-5.237%Cost efficiency
codestral-latestLeads82%glm-5.243%Image understanding
codestral-latestNo image inputglm-5.2No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
codestral-latest
98.36%
glm-5.2
99.94%
Average response time
codestral-latest
3,439.06 ms
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
P95 API latency
codestral-latest
10,000 ms
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 99.3%glm-5.2: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 4,108 msglm-5.2: 666 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 10,000 msglm-5.2: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.2 has a larger context window.
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.