deepseek-v4-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
deepseek-v4-provsglm-5.2
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
deepseek-v4-proBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
glm-5.2
976,000 tokens
Reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro
Not supported
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
deepseek-v4-pro · leads in 4
46%
Weak
glm-5.2 · leads in 25
56%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
deepseek-v4-pro48%glm-5.2Leads50%Logical reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro26%glm-5.2Leads57%Mathematics
deepseek-v4-proLeads63%glm-5.262%Scientific and technical depth
deepseek-v4-proLeads57%glm-5.256%Planning and task decomposition
deepseek-v4-pro26%glm-5.2Leads57%
Coding & tools
Code generation
deepseek-v4-proLeads60%glm-5.247%Debugging and code review
deepseek-v4-pro49%glm-5.2Leads58%Agentic coding
deepseek-v4-pro42%glm-5.2Leads61%Tool and function calling
deepseek-v4-pro42%glm-5.2Leads55%SQL and query writing
deepseek-v4-pro58%glm-5.2Leads63%
Writing & language
Creative writing
deepseek-v4-pro34%glm-5.2Leads44%Professional writing
deepseek-v4-pro42%glm-5.2Leads51%Conversational quality
deepseek-v4-pro34%glm-5.2Leads49%Multilingual ability
deepseek-v4-pro59%glm-5.2Leads84%Translation
deepseek-v4-pro48%glm-5.2Leads61%Summarization
deepseek-v4-pro53%glm-5.2Leads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
deepseek-v4-pro51%glm-5.2Leads61%Professional domains
deepseek-v4-pro44%glm-5.2Leads53%Information extraction
deepseek-v4-pro51%glm-5.2Leads61%Classification and labeling
deepseek-v4-pro49%glm-5.2Leads61%Long-context handling
deepseek-v4-proLeads75%glm-5.267%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
deepseek-v4-pro40%glm-5.2Leads53%Structured output
deepseek-v4-pro59%glm-5.2Leads60%Factual accuracy
deepseek-v4-pro44%glm-5.2Leads50%Safety and alignment
deepseek-v4-pro34%glm-5.2Leads45%Steerability
deepseek-v4-pro36%glm-5.2Leads49%Output consistency
deepseek-v4-pro59%glm-5.2Leads60%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
deepseek-v4-pro32%glm-5.2Leads37%Cost efficiency
deepseek-v4-pro30%glm-5.2Leads43%Image understanding
deepseek-v4-proNo image inputglm-5.2No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
deepseek-v4-pro
99.37%
glm-5.2
99.94%
Average response time
deepseek-v4-pro
21,349.57 ms
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-pro
60,000 ms
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 100%glm-5.2: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 21,275 msglm-5.2: 666 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 60,000 msglm-5.2: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-pro has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.