anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
Chat comparison
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7vscodestral-latest
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
codestral-latest
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
text, image, json
codestral-latest
text
Vision
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Better fit
Supported
codestral-latest
Not supported
Reasoning
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Better fit
Supported
codestral-latest
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
100%
codestral-latest
98.49%
Average response time
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
4,488.43 ms
codestral-latest
3,128.54 ms
P95 API latency
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
30,000 ms
codestral-latest
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 supports image input while the other model does not.