codestral-latest
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
codestral-latestvsgpt-5.6-sol
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-sol
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
codestral-latest
32,000 tokens
gpt-5.6-solBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
Input formats
codestral-latest
text
gpt-5.6-sol
text, image
Vision
codestral-latest
Not supported
gpt-5.6-solBetter fit
Supported
Reasoning
codestral-latest
Not supported
gpt-5.6-solBetter fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
codestral-latest
98.49%
gpt-5.6-sol
90.07%
Average response time
codestral-latest
3,128.54 ms
gpt-5.6-sol
31,830.78 ms
P95 API latency
codestral-latest
10,000 ms
gpt-5.6-sol
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 98.6%gpt-5.6-sol: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 5,627 msgpt-5.6-sol: 15,455 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 30,000 msgpt-5.6-sol: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-sol has a larger context window.
- gpt-5.6-sol supports image input while the other model does not.
- codestral-latest recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.