LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-opus-5-5vscodestral-latest

Mistral AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-opus-5-5

Checking current pricing…

codestral-latest

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

claude-opus-5-5Better fit

1,000,000 tokens

codestral-latest

32,000 tokens

Input formats

claude-opus-5-5

text, image, json

codestral-latest

text

Vision

claude-opus-5-5Better fit

Supported

codestral-latest

Not supported

Reasoning

claude-opus-5-5Better fit

Supported

codestral-latest

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-opus-5-5 · leads in 26

88%

Strong

codestral-latest · leads in 3

28%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-opus-5-5Leads90%
    codestral-latest9%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-opus-5-5Leads92%
    codestral-latest10%
  • Mathematics

    claude-opus-5-5Leads91%
    codestral-latest25%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-opus-5-5Leads95%
    codestral-latest15%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-opus-5-5Leads92%
    codestral-latest11%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-opus-5-584%
    codestral-latestLeads85%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-opus-5-5Leads93%
    codestral-latest60%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-opus-5-5Leads95%
    codestral-latest44%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-opus-5-5Leads92%
    codestral-latest33%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-opus-5-5Leads92%
    codestral-latest60%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-opus-5-5Leads91%
    codestral-latest7%
  • Professional writing

    claude-opus-5-5Leads95%
    codestral-latest8%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-opus-5-5Leads93%
    codestral-latest7%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-opus-5-5Leads80%
    codestral-latest32%
  • Translation

    claude-opus-5-5Leads93%
    codestral-latest11%
  • Summarization

    claude-opus-5-5Leads95%
    codestral-latest7%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-opus-5-5Leads96%
    codestral-latest13%
  • Professional domains

    claude-opus-5-5Leads95%
    codestral-latest5%
  • Information extraction

    claude-opus-5-5Leads96%
    codestral-latest16%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-opus-5-5Leads88%
    codestral-latest15%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-opus-5-5Leads96%
    codestral-latest15%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-opus-5-5Leads93%
    codestral-latest21%
  • Structured output

    claude-opus-5-5Leads100%
    codestral-latest44%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-opus-5-5Leads97%
    codestral-latest17%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-opus-5-5Leads94%
    codestral-latest14%
  • Steerability

    claude-opus-5-5Leads95%
    codestral-latest14%
  • Output consistency

    claude-opus-5-5Leads97%
    codestral-latest52%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-opus-5-513%
    codestral-latestLeads85%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-opus-5-524%
    codestral-latestLeads82%
  • Image understanding

    claude-opus-5-587%
    codestral-latestNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-opus-5-5

98.83%

codestral-latest

98.36%

Average response time

claude-opus-5-5

12,553.5 ms

codestral-latest

3,439.06 ms

P95 API latency

claude-opus-5-5

60,000 ms

codestral-latest

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-5-5: 100%codestral-latest: 99.3%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-5-5: 3,043 mscodestral-latest: 4,108 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-5-5: 5,000 mscodestral-latest: 10,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-opus-5-5 has a larger context window.
  • claude-opus-5-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring