claude-opus-5-5
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5-5vsInkling-Small
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
Inkling-Small
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-opus-5-5Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
Inkling-Small
512,000 tokens
Input formats
claude-opus-5-5
text, image, json
Inkling-Small
text
Vision
claude-opus-5-5Better fit
Supported
Inkling-Small
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
claude-opus-5-5 · leads in 27
88%
Strong
Inkling-Small · leads in 2
28%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-5-5Leads90%Inkling-Small12%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%Inkling-Small33%Mathematics
claude-opus-5-5Leads91%Inkling-Small25%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%Inkling-Small21%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%Inkling-Small36%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-5-5Leads84%Inkling-Small21%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%Inkling-Small31%Agentic coding
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%Inkling-Small41%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%Inkling-Small33%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%Inkling-Small27%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5-5Leads91%Inkling-Small26%Professional writing
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%Inkling-Small23%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%Inkling-Small19%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-5-5Leads80%Inkling-Small13%Translation
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%Inkling-Small18%Summarization
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%Inkling-Small28%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-5-5Leads96%Inkling-Small30%Professional domains
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%Inkling-Small24%Information extraction
claude-opus-5-5Leads96%Inkling-Small30%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-5-5Leads88%Inkling-Small25%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5-5Leads96%Inkling-Small49%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%Inkling-Small26%Structured output
claude-opus-5-5Leads100%Inkling-Small37%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5-5Leads97%Inkling-Small17%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5-5Leads94%Inkling-Small20%Steerability
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%Inkling-Small26%Output consistency
claude-opus-5-5Leads97%Inkling-Small38%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-5-513%Inkling-SmallLeads54%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-5-524%Inkling-SmallLeads31%Image understanding
claude-opus-5-587%Inkling-SmallNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5-5
98.83%
Inkling-Small
100%
Average response time
claude-opus-5-5
12,553.5 ms
Inkling-Small
1,109 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-5-5
60,000 ms
Inkling-Small
2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- claude-opus-5-5 has a larger context window.
- claude-opus-5-5 supports image input while the other model does not.