gpt-6.1-sol
Chat comparison
gpt-6.1-solvsInkling-Small
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
Inkling-Small
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
Inkling-Small
512,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-6.1-sol
text, image, json
Inkling-Small
text
Vision
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
Supported
Inkling-Small
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 28
86%
Strong
Inkling-Small · leads in 1
28%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%Inkling-Small12%Logical reasoning
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%Inkling-Small33%Mathematics
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%Inkling-Small25%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%Inkling-Small21%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%Inkling-Small36%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%Inkling-Small21%Debugging and code review
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%Inkling-Small31%Agentic coding
gpt-6.1-solLeads93%Inkling-Small41%Tool and function calling
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%Inkling-Small33%SQL and query writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads94%Inkling-Small27%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads82%Inkling-Small26%Professional writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%Inkling-Small23%Conversational quality
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%Inkling-Small19%Multilingual ability
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%Inkling-Small13%Translation
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%Inkling-Small18%Summarization
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%Inkling-Small28%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%Inkling-Small30%Professional domains
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%Inkling-Small24%Information extraction
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%Inkling-Small30%Classification and labeling
gpt-6.1-solLeads100%Inkling-Small25%Long-context handling
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%Inkling-Small49%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%Inkling-Small26%Structured output
gpt-6.1-solLeads99%Inkling-Small37%Factual accuracy
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%Inkling-Small17%Safety and alignment
gpt-6.1-solLeads79%Inkling-Small20%Steerability
gpt-6.1-solLeads84%Inkling-Small26%Output consistency
gpt-6.1-solLeads97%Inkling-Small38%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6.1-sol40%Inkling-SmallLeads54%Cost efficiency
gpt-6.1-solLeads49%Inkling-Small31%Image understanding
gpt-6.1-sol68%Inkling-SmallNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6.1-sol
98.17%
Inkling-Small
100%
Average response time
gpt-6.1-sol
18,340.6 ms
Inkling-Small
1,109 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6.1-sol
60,000 ms
Inkling-Small
2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-6.1-sol has a larger context window.
- gpt-6.1-sol supports image input while the other model does not.