claude-opus-5-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5-5vskimi-k3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-opus-5-5
text, image, json
kimi-k3
text
Vision
claude-opus-5-5Better fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Reasoning
claude-opus-5-5Better fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-5-5 · leads in 27
88%
Strong
kimi-k3 · leads in 2
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-5-5Leads90%kimi-k340%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%kimi-k322%Mathematics
claude-opus-5-5Leads91%kimi-k339%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%kimi-k332%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%kimi-k323%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-5-5Leads84%kimi-k331%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%kimi-k329%Agentic coding
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%kimi-k333%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%kimi-k335%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-5-5Leads92%kimi-k335%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5-5Leads91%kimi-k334%Professional writing
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%kimi-k337%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%kimi-k334%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-5-5Leads80%kimi-k361%Translation
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%kimi-k346%Summarization
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%kimi-k362%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-5-5Leads96%kimi-k343%Professional domains
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%kimi-k334%Information extraction
claude-opus-5-5Leads96%kimi-k351%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-5-5Leads88%kimi-k341%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5-5Leads96%kimi-k385%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-5-5Leads93%kimi-k334%Structured output
claude-opus-5-5Leads100%kimi-k350%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5-5Leads97%kimi-k340%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5-5Leads94%kimi-k334%Steerability
claude-opus-5-5Leads95%kimi-k329%Output consistency
claude-opus-5-5Leads97%kimi-k348%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-5-513%kimi-k3Leads35%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-5-524%kimi-k3Leads39%Image understanding
claude-opus-5-587%kimi-k3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5-5
98.83%
kimi-k3
97.87%
Average response time
claude-opus-5-5
12,553.5 ms
kimi-k3
12,694.11 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-5-5
60,000 ms
kimi-k3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5-5: 100%kimi-k3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5-5: 3,043 mskimi-k3: 69,350 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5-5: 5,000 mskimi-k3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.