LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-fable-5vsclaude-opus-5-5

Anthropic logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-fable-5

Checking current pricing…

claude-opus-5-5

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

claude-fable-5

text

claude-opus-5-5

text, image, json

Vision

claude-fable-5

Not supported

claude-opus-5-5Better fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-fable-5 · leads in 24

91%

Strong

claude-opus-5-5 · leads in 4

88%

Strong

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-590%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-592%
  • Mathematics

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-591%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-595%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-592%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-fable-5Leads88%
    claude-opus-5-584%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-opus-5-593%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-595%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-592%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-592%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-591%
  • Professional writing

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-595%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-593%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-fable-5Leads82%
    claude-opus-5-580%
  • Translation

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-opus-5-593%
  • Summarization

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-595%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-fable-596%
    claude-opus-5-596%
  • Professional domains

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-opus-5-595%
  • Information extraction

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-opus-5-596%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-opus-5-588%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-596%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-593%
  • Structured output

    claude-fable-598%
    claude-opus-5-5Leads100%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-597%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-594%
  • Steerability

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-opus-5-595%
  • Output consistency

    claude-fable-584%
    claude-opus-5-5Leads97%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-fable-511%
    claude-opus-5-5Leads13%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-fable-515%
    claude-opus-5-5Leads24%
  • Image understanding

    claude-fable-5No image input
    claude-opus-5-587%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-fable-5

99.32%

claude-opus-5-5

98.83%

Average response time

claude-fable-5

8,411.23 ms

claude-opus-5-5

12,553.5 ms

P95 API latency

claude-fable-5

30,000 ms

claude-opus-5-5

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-fable-5: 100%claude-opus-5-5: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-fable-5: 10,131 msclaude-opus-5-5: 3,043 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-fable-5: 30,000 msclaude-opus-5-5: 5,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-opus-5-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • claude-fable-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring