kimi-k3
Chat comparison
kimi-k3vsmistral-large-3:675b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-large-3:675b
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
kimi-k3Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
mistral-large-3:675b
256,000 tokens
Input formats
kimi-k3
text
mistral-large-3:675b
text, image
Vision
kimi-k3
Not supported
mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
kimi-k3Better fit
Supported
mistral-large-3:675b
Not supported
Reasoning
kimi-k3
Not supported
mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
kimi-k3 · leads in 5
40%
Weak
mistral-large-3:675b · leads in 24
49%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
kimi-k340%mistral-large-3:675bLeads52%Logical reasoning
kimi-k322%mistral-large-3:675bLeads57%Mathematics
kimi-k339%mistral-large-3:675bLeads62%Scientific and technical depth
kimi-k332%mistral-large-3:675bLeads62%Planning and task decomposition
kimi-k323%mistral-large-3:675bLeads55%
Coding & tools
Code generation
kimi-k331%mistral-large-3:675bLeads49%Debugging and code review
kimi-k329%mistral-large-3:675bLeads56%Agentic coding
kimi-k333%mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%Tool and function calling
kimi-k335%mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%SQL and query writing
kimi-k335%mistral-large-3:675bLeads55%
Writing & language
Creative writing
kimi-k334%mistral-large-3:675bLeads50%Professional writing
kimi-k337%mistral-large-3:675bLeads49%Conversational quality
kimi-k334%mistral-large-3:675bLeads50%Multilingual ability
kimi-k361%mistral-large-3:675bLeads86%Translation
kimi-k346%mistral-large-3:675bLeads59%Summarization
kimi-k3Leads62%mistral-large-3:675b45%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
kimi-k343%mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%Professional domains
kimi-k334%mistral-large-3:675bLeads56%Information extraction
kimi-k3Leads51%mistral-large-3:675b33%Classification and labeling
kimi-k341%mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%Long-context handling
kimi-k3Leads85%mistral-large-3:675b44%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
kimi-k334%mistral-large-3:675bLeads36%Structured output
kimi-k3Leads50%mistral-large-3:675b9%Factual accuracy
kimi-k340%mistral-large-3:675bLeads52%Safety and alignment
kimi-k334%mistral-large-3:675bLeads45%Steerability
kimi-k329%mistral-large-3:675bLeads46%Output consistency
kimi-k348%mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
kimi-k3Leads35%mistral-large-3:675b34%Cost efficiency
kimi-k339%mistral-large-3:675bLeads48%Image understanding
kimi-k3No image inputmistral-large-3:675b17%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
kimi-k3
97.87%
mistral-large-3:675b
100%
Average response time
kimi-k3
12,694.11 ms
mistral-large-3:675b
17,950.15 ms
P95 API latency
kimi-k3
60,000 ms
mistral-large-3:675b
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- kimi-k3 has a larger context window.
- mistral-large-3:675b supports image input while the other model does not.
- mistral-large-3:675b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.