codestral-latest
Chat comparison
codestral-latestvsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
codestral-latest
32,000 tokens
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
Input formats
codestral-latest
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
codestral-latest
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
codestral-latestBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
codestral-latest · leads in 9
28%
Weak
llama-4-maverick · leads in 20
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
codestral-latest9%llama-4-maverickLeads60%Logical reasoning
codestral-latest10%llama-4-maverickLeads26%Mathematics
codestral-latest25%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Scientific and technical depth
codestral-latest15%llama-4-maverickLeads45%Planning and task decomposition
codestral-latest11%llama-4-maverickLeads25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
codestral-latestLeads85%llama-4-maverick36%Debugging and code review
codestral-latestLeads60%llama-4-maverick33%Agentic coding
codestral-latestLeads44%llama-4-maverick34%Tool and function calling
codestral-latest33%llama-4-maverickLeads36%SQL and query writing
codestral-latestLeads60%llama-4-maverick34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
codestral-latest7%llama-4-maverickLeads48%Professional writing
codestral-latest8%llama-4-maverickLeads39%Conversational quality
codestral-latest7%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Multilingual ability
codestral-latest32%llama-4-maverickLeads62%Translation
codestral-latest11%llama-4-maverickLeads47%Summarization
codestral-latest7%llama-4-maverickLeads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
codestral-latest13%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Professional domains
codestral-latest5%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Information extraction
codestral-latest16%llama-4-maverickLeads27%Classification and labeling
codestral-latest15%llama-4-maverickLeads49%Long-context handling
codestral-latest15%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
codestral-latestLeads21%llama-4-maverick19%Structured output
codestral-latestLeads44%llama-4-maverick7%Factual accuracy
codestral-latest17%llama-4-maverickLeads44%Safety and alignment
codestral-latest14%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Steerability
codestral-latest14%llama-4-maverickLeads31%Output consistency
codestral-latestLeads52%llama-4-maverick41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
codestral-latestLeads85%llama-4-maverick45%Cost efficiency
codestral-latestLeads82%llama-4-maverick46%Image understanding
codestral-latestNo image inputllama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
codestral-latest
98.36%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
codestral-latest
3,439.06 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
P95 API latency
codestral-latest
10,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- codestral-latest recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.