LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Mistral AI logo

codestral-latestvsllama-4-maverick

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

codestral-latest

Checking current pricing…

llama-4-maverick

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

codestral-latest

32,000 tokens

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

1,048,576 tokens

Input formats

codestral-latest

text

llama-4-maverick

text, image

Vision

codestral-latest

Not supported

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

Supported

JSON mode

codestral-latestBetter fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

codestral-latest · leads in 9

28%

Weak

llama-4-maverick · leads in 20

40%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    codestral-latest9%
    llama-4-maverickLeads60%
  • Logical reasoning

    codestral-latest10%
    llama-4-maverickLeads26%
  • Mathematics

    codestral-latest25%
    llama-4-maverickLeads36%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    codestral-latest15%
    llama-4-maverickLeads45%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    codestral-latest11%
    llama-4-maverickLeads25%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    codestral-latestLeads85%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • Debugging and code review

    codestral-latestLeads60%
    llama-4-maverick33%
  • Agentic coding

    codestral-latestLeads44%
    llama-4-maverick34%
  • Tool and function calling

    codestral-latest33%
    llama-4-maverickLeads36%
  • SQL and query writing

    codestral-latestLeads60%
    llama-4-maverick34%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    codestral-latest7%
    llama-4-maverickLeads48%
  • Professional writing

    codestral-latest8%
    llama-4-maverickLeads39%
  • Conversational quality

    codestral-latest7%
    llama-4-maverickLeads38%
  • Multilingual ability

    codestral-latest32%
    llama-4-maverickLeads62%
  • Translation

    codestral-latest11%
    llama-4-maverickLeads47%
  • Summarization

    codestral-latest7%
    llama-4-maverickLeads57%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    codestral-latest13%
    llama-4-maverickLeads38%
  • Professional domains

    codestral-latest5%
    llama-4-maverickLeads41%
  • Information extraction

    codestral-latest16%
    llama-4-maverickLeads27%
  • Classification and labeling

    codestral-latest15%
    llama-4-maverickLeads49%
  • Long-context handling

    codestral-latest15%
    llama-4-maverickLeads89%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    codestral-latestLeads21%
    llama-4-maverick19%
  • Structured output

    codestral-latestLeads44%
    llama-4-maverick7%
  • Factual accuracy

    codestral-latest17%
    llama-4-maverickLeads44%
  • Safety and alignment

    codestral-latest14%
    llama-4-maverickLeads41%
  • Steerability

    codestral-latest14%
    llama-4-maverickLeads31%
  • Output consistency

    codestral-latestLeads52%
    llama-4-maverick41%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    codestral-latestLeads85%
    llama-4-maverick45%
  • Cost efficiency

    codestral-latestLeads82%
    llama-4-maverick46%
  • Image understanding

    codestral-latestNo image input
    llama-4-maverick25%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

codestral-latest

98.36%

llama-4-maverick

95.34%

Average response time

codestral-latest

3,439.06 ms

llama-4-maverick

4,496.14 ms

P95 API latency

codestral-latest

10,000 ms

llama-4-maverick

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 99.3%llama-4-maverick: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 4,108 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 10,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
  • llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
  • codestral-latest recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring