llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
llama-4-maverickvsmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
128,000 tokens
Input formats
llama-4-maverick
text, image
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
text
Vision
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Tool calling
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
JSON mode
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
llama-4-maverick · leads in 20
40%
Weak
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 9
34%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
llama-4-maverickLeads60%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Logical reasoning
llama-4-maverickLeads26%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240715%Mathematics
llama-4-maverickLeads36%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240727%Scientific and technical depth
llama-4-maverickLeads45%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240723%Planning and task decomposition
llama-4-maverickLeads25%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%
Coding & tools
Code generation
llama-4-maverickLeads36%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%Debugging and code review
llama-4-maverickLeads33%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Agentic coding
llama-4-maverickLeads34%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%Tool and function calling
llama-4-maverickLeads36%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%SQL and query writing
llama-4-maverick34%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%
Writing & language
Creative writing
llama-4-maverickLeads48%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240728%Professional writing
llama-4-maverickLeads39%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Conversational quality
llama-4-maverickLeads38%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Multilingual ability
llama-4-maverick62%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads65%Translation
llama-4-maverickLeads47%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240732%Summarization
llama-4-maverickLeads57%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240725%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
llama-4-maverickLeads38%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240721%Professional domains
llama-4-maverickLeads41%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240718%Information extraction
llama-4-maverick27%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%Classification and labeling
llama-4-maverickLeads49%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Long-context handling
llama-4-maverickLeads89%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240729%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
llama-4-maverick19%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads45%Structured output
llama-4-maverick7%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads51%Factual accuracy
llama-4-maverickLeads44%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Safety and alignment
llama-4-maverickLeads41%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240733%Steerability
llama-4-maverick31%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads39%Output consistency
llama-4-maverick41%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads71%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
llama-4-maverick45%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads76%Cost efficiency
llama-4-maverick46%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads84%Image understanding
llama-4-maverick25%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
99.4%
Average response time
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
5,547.3 ms
P95 API latency
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 100%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 4,572 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 5,000 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.