llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
llama-4-maverickvsminimax-m3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
minimax-m3
512,000 tokens
Input formats
llama-4-maverick
text, image
minimax-m3
text
Vision
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
minimax-m3
Not supported
JSON mode
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
Reasoning
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
llama-4-maverick
95.29%
minimax-m3
100%
Average response time
llama-4-maverick
4,187.49 ms
minimax-m3
18,868.2 ms
P95 API latency
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 100%minimax-m3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 4,203 msminimax-m3: 21,794 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
llama-4-maverick: 10,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- minimax-m3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.