LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

llama-4-maverickvsminimax-m3

MiniMax logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

llama-4-maverick

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

1,048,576 tokens

minimax-m3

512,000 tokens

Input formats

llama-4-maverick

text, image

minimax-m3

text

Vision

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

Supported

minimax-m3

Not supported

JSON mode

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

minimax-m3Better fit

Supported

Reasoning

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

minimax-m3Better fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

llama-4-maverick · leads in 8

40%

Weak

minimax-m3 · leads in 21

47%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    llama-4-maverickLeads60%
    minimax-m335%
  • Logical reasoning

    llama-4-maverick26%
    minimax-m3Leads50%
  • Mathematics

    llama-4-maverick36%
    minimax-m3Leads51%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    llama-4-maverickLeads45%
    minimax-m342%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    llama-4-maverick25%
    minimax-m3Leads52%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    llama-4-maverick36%
    minimax-m3Leads37%
  • Debugging and code review

    llama-4-maverick33%
    minimax-m3Leads47%
  • Agentic coding

    llama-4-maverick34%
    minimax-m3Leads55%
  • Tool and function calling

    llama-4-maverick36%
    minimax-m3Leads51%
  • SQL and query writing

    llama-4-maverick34%
    minimax-m3Leads48%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    llama-4-maverickLeads48%
    minimax-m338%
  • Professional writing

    llama-4-maverick39%
    minimax-m3Leads40%
  • Conversational quality

    llama-4-maverick38%
    minimax-m3Leads43%
  • Multilingual ability

    llama-4-maverick62%
    minimax-m3Leads65%
  • Translation

    llama-4-maverick47%
    minimax-m3Leads50%
  • Summarization

    llama-4-maverickLeads57%
    minimax-m348%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    llama-4-maverick38%
    minimax-m3Leads50%
  • Professional domains

    llama-4-maverick41%
    minimax-m3Leads43%
  • Information extraction

    llama-4-maverick27%
    minimax-m3Leads51%
  • Classification and labeling

    llama-4-maverick49%
    minimax-m3Leads51%
  • Long-context handling

    llama-4-maverickLeads89%
    minimax-m359%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    llama-4-maverick19%
    minimax-m3Leads46%
  • Structured output

    llama-4-maverick7%
    minimax-m3Leads51%
  • Factual accuracy

    llama-4-maverickLeads44%
    minimax-m337%
  • Safety and alignment

    llama-4-maverickLeads41%
    minimax-m335%
  • Steerability

    llama-4-maverick31%
    minimax-m3Leads44%
  • Output consistency

    llama-4-maverick41%
    minimax-m3Leads50%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    llama-4-maverickLeads45%
    minimax-m340%
  • Cost efficiency

    llama-4-maverick46%
    minimax-m3Leads52%
  • Image understanding

    llama-4-maverick25%
    minimax-m3No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

llama-4-maverick

95.34%

minimax-m3

99.29%

Average response time

llama-4-maverick

4,496.14 ms

minimax-m3

22,425.83 ms

P95 API latency

llama-4-maverick

10,000 ms

minimax-m3

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

llama-4-maverick: 100%minimax-m3: 100%
22 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

llama-4-maverick: 4,572 msminimax-m3: 27,175 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

llama-4-maverick: 5,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
  • llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
  • minimax-m3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring