glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.2
976,000 tokens
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
Input formats
glm-5.2
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
glm-5.2
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Reasoning
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
glm-5.2 · leads in 23
56%
Moderate
llama-4-maverick · leads in 5
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
glm-5.250%llama-4-maverickLeads60%Logical reasoning
glm-5.2Leads57%llama-4-maverick26%Mathematics
glm-5.2Leads62%llama-4-maverick36%Scientific and technical depth
glm-5.2Leads56%llama-4-maverick45%Planning and task decomposition
glm-5.2Leads57%llama-4-maverick25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
glm-5.2Leads47%llama-4-maverick36%Debugging and code review
glm-5.2Leads58%llama-4-maverick33%Agentic coding
glm-5.2Leads61%llama-4-maverick34%Tool and function calling
glm-5.2Leads55%llama-4-maverick36%SQL and query writing
glm-5.2Leads63%llama-4-maverick34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
glm-5.244%llama-4-maverickLeads48%Professional writing
glm-5.2Leads51%llama-4-maverick39%Conversational quality
glm-5.2Leads49%llama-4-maverick38%Multilingual ability
glm-5.2Leads84%llama-4-maverick62%Translation
glm-5.2Leads61%llama-4-maverick47%Summarization
glm-5.257%llama-4-maverick57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
glm-5.2Leads61%llama-4-maverick38%Professional domains
glm-5.2Leads53%llama-4-maverick41%Information extraction
glm-5.2Leads61%llama-4-maverick27%Classification and labeling
glm-5.2Leads61%llama-4-maverick49%Long-context handling
glm-5.267%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
glm-5.2Leads53%llama-4-maverick19%Structured output
glm-5.2Leads60%llama-4-maverick7%Factual accuracy
glm-5.2Leads50%llama-4-maverick44%Safety and alignment
glm-5.2Leads45%llama-4-maverick41%Steerability
glm-5.2Leads49%llama-4-maverick31%Output consistency
glm-5.2Leads60%llama-4-maverick41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
glm-5.237%llama-4-maverickLeads45%Cost efficiency
glm-5.243%llama-4-maverickLeads46%Image understanding
glm-5.2No image inputllama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
99.94%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 100%llama-4-maverick: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 666 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 5,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.