LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5vsglm-5.2

Z.ai logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Better fit

1,000,000 tokens

glm-5.2

976,000 tokens

Input formats

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5

text, image

glm-5.2

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Better fit

Supported

glm-5.2

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5 · leads in 26

86%

Strong

glm-5.2 · leads in 3

56%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads89%
    glm-5.250%
  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads90%
    glm-5.257%
  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads87%
    glm-5.262%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads88%
    glm-5.256%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads89%
    glm-5.257%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads83%
    glm-5.247%
  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads90%
    glm-5.258%
  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads92%
    glm-5.261%
  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads91%
    glm-5.255%
  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads89%
    glm-5.263%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads89%
    glm-5.244%
  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads94%
    glm-5.251%
  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads93%
    glm-5.249%
  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-574%
    glm-5.2Leads84%
  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads89%
    glm-5.261%
  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads92%
    glm-5.257%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads90%
    glm-5.261%
  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads91%
    glm-5.253%
  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads92%
    glm-5.261%
  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads90%
    glm-5.261%
  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads95%
    glm-5.267%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads94%
    glm-5.253%
  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads97%
    glm-5.260%
  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads98%
    glm-5.250%
  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads95%
    glm-5.245%
  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads95%
    glm-5.249%
  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5Leads100%
    glm-5.260%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-524%
    glm-5.2Leads37%
  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-531%
    glm-5.2Leads43%
  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-577%
    glm-5.2No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5

90.82%

glm-5.2

99.94%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5

8,228.61 ms

glm-5.2

2,766.68 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5

60,000 ms

glm-5.2

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5: 90.7%glm-5.2: 100%
25 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5: 7,798 msglm-5.2: 666 ms
25 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5: 30,000 msglm-5.2: 5,000 ms
25 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5 has a larger context window.
  • anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring