gemini-3-flash
Chat comparison
gemini-3-flashvsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gemini-3-flash
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
gemini-3-flash
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
gemini-3-flashBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Reasoning
gemini-3-flashBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3-flash
81.67%
llama-4-maverick
95.29%
Average response time
gemini-3-flash
6,437.71 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,187.49 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3-flash
30,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- llama-4-maverick recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.