kimi-k3
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
kimi-k3vsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
kimi-k3
1,000,000 tokens
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
Input formats
kimi-k3
text
llama-4-maverick
text, image
Vision
kimi-k3
Not supported
llama-4-maverickBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
kimi-k3Better fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
kimi-k3 · leads in 8
40%
Weak
llama-4-maverick · leads in 21
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
kimi-k340%llama-4-maverickLeads60%Logical reasoning
kimi-k322%llama-4-maverickLeads26%Mathematics
kimi-k3Leads39%llama-4-maverick36%Scientific and technical depth
kimi-k332%llama-4-maverickLeads45%Planning and task decomposition
kimi-k323%llama-4-maverickLeads25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
kimi-k331%llama-4-maverickLeads36%Debugging and code review
kimi-k329%llama-4-maverickLeads33%Agentic coding
kimi-k333%llama-4-maverickLeads34%Tool and function calling
kimi-k335%llama-4-maverickLeads36%SQL and query writing
kimi-k3Leads35%llama-4-maverick34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
kimi-k334%llama-4-maverickLeads48%Professional writing
kimi-k337%llama-4-maverickLeads39%Conversational quality
kimi-k334%llama-4-maverickLeads38%Multilingual ability
kimi-k361%llama-4-maverickLeads62%Translation
kimi-k346%llama-4-maverickLeads47%Summarization
kimi-k3Leads62%llama-4-maverick57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
kimi-k3Leads43%llama-4-maverick38%Professional domains
kimi-k334%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Information extraction
kimi-k3Leads51%llama-4-maverick27%Classification and labeling
kimi-k341%llama-4-maverickLeads49%Long-context handling
kimi-k385%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
kimi-k3Leads34%llama-4-maverick19%Structured output
kimi-k3Leads50%llama-4-maverick7%Factual accuracy
kimi-k340%llama-4-maverickLeads44%Safety and alignment
kimi-k334%llama-4-maverickLeads41%Steerability
kimi-k329%llama-4-maverickLeads31%Output consistency
kimi-k3Leads48%llama-4-maverick41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
kimi-k335%llama-4-maverickLeads45%Cost efficiency
kimi-k339%llama-4-maverickLeads46%Image understanding
kimi-k3No image inputllama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
kimi-k3
97.87%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
kimi-k3
12,694.11 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
P95 API latency
kimi-k3
60,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k3: 100%llama-4-maverick: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k3: 69,350 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k3: 60,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
- llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
- kimi-k3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.