gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-terravskimi-k3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-5.6-terra
text, image
kimi-k3
text
Vision
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 28
83%
Strong
kimi-k3 · leads in 0
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%kimi-k340%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%kimi-k322%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%kimi-k339%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%kimi-k332%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%kimi-k323%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%kimi-k331%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%kimi-k329%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%kimi-k333%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%kimi-k335%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%kimi-k335%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%kimi-k334%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-terraLeads84%kimi-k337%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%kimi-k334%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%kimi-k361%Translation
gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%kimi-k346%Summarization
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%kimi-k362%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%kimi-k343%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%kimi-k334%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-terraLeads91%kimi-k351%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%kimi-k341%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-terra85%kimi-k385%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-terraLeads83%kimi-k334%Structured output
gpt-5.6-terraLeads89%kimi-k350%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-terraLeads82%kimi-k340%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-terraLeads74%kimi-k334%Steerability
gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%kimi-k329%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%kimi-k348%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-terraLeads44%kimi-k335%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%kimi-k339%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-terra59%kimi-k3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-terra
93.73%
kimi-k3
97.87%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-terra
29,135.19 ms
kimi-k3
12,694.11 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
kimi-k3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-terra: 100%kimi-k3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-terra: 17,864 mskimi-k3: 69,350 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 mskimi-k3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-terra supports image input while the other model does not.
- kimi-k3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.