glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vskimi-k3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.2
976,000 tokens
kimi-k3Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
Input formats
glm-5.2
text
kimi-k3
text, image
Vision
glm-5.2
Not supported
kimi-k3Better fit
Supported
JSON mode
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
100%
kimi-k3
98.65%
Average response time
glm-5.2
3,617.34 ms
kimi-k3
5,233.65 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
kimi-k3
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 100%kimi-k3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 4,751 mskimi-k3: 7,514 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 30,000 mskimi-k3: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k3 has a larger context window.
- kimi-k3 supports image input while the other model does not.
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.