glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vsnemotron-3-nano:30b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
nemotron-3-nano:30b
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.2
976,000 tokens
nemotron-3-nano:30bBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
JSON mode
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
nemotron-3-nano:30b
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
glm-5.2 · leads in 26
56%
Moderate
nemotron-3-nano:30b · leads in 3
39%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
glm-5.2Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b28%Logical reasoning
glm-5.2Leads57%nemotron-3-nano:30b44%Mathematics
glm-5.2Leads62%nemotron-3-nano:30b47%Scientific and technical depth
glm-5.2Leads56%nemotron-3-nano:30b41%Planning and task decomposition
glm-5.2Leads57%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%
Coding & tools
Code generation
glm-5.2Leads47%nemotron-3-nano:30b35%Debugging and code review
glm-5.2Leads58%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Agentic coding
glm-5.2Leads61%nemotron-3-nano:30b48%Tool and function calling
glm-5.2Leads55%nemotron-3-nano:30b37%SQL and query writing
glm-5.2Leads63%nemotron-3-nano:30b39%
Writing & language
Creative writing
glm-5.2Leads44%nemotron-3-nano:30b28%Professional writing
glm-5.2Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b24%Conversational quality
glm-5.2Leads49%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Multilingual ability
glm-5.2Leads84%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Translation
glm-5.2Leads61%nemotron-3-nano:30b35%Summarization
glm-5.2Leads57%nemotron-3-nano:30b47%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
glm-5.2Leads61%nemotron-3-nano:30b40%Professional domains
glm-5.2Leads53%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Information extraction
glm-5.2Leads61%nemotron-3-nano:30b25%Classification and labeling
glm-5.2Leads61%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Long-context handling
glm-5.267%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads70%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
glm-5.2Leads53%nemotron-3-nano:30b21%Structured output
glm-5.2Leads60%nemotron-3-nano:30b8%Factual accuracy
glm-5.2Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b34%Safety and alignment
glm-5.2Leads45%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Steerability
glm-5.2Leads49%nemotron-3-nano:30b31%Output consistency
glm-5.2Leads60%nemotron-3-nano:30b40%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
glm-5.237%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads71%Cost efficiency
glm-5.243%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads80%Image understanding
glm-5.2No image inputnemotron-3-nano:30bNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
99.94%
nemotron-3-nano:30b
98.3%
Average response time
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
nemotron-3-nano:30b
3,194.26 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
nemotron-3-nano:30b
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 100%nemotron-3-nano:30b: 99%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 666 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 4,647 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 5,000 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- nemotron-3-nano:30b has a larger context window.
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.