LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3.8-flash-highvsglm-5.2

Z.ai logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3.8-flash-high

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

gemini-3.8-flash-highBetter fit

1,000,000 tokens

glm-5.2

976,000 tokens

Input formats

gemini-3.8-flash-high

text, image

glm-5.2

text

Vision

gemini-3.8-flash-highBetter fit

Supported

glm-5.2

Not supported

JSON mode

gemini-3.8-flash-high

Not supported

glm-5.2Better fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemini-3.8-flash-high · leads in 24

67%

Moderate

glm-5.2 · leads in 5

56%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    glm-5.250%
  • Logical reasoning

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads70%
    glm-5.257%
  • Mathematics

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads73%
    glm-5.262%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads70%
    glm-5.256%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads67%
    glm-5.257%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads50%
    glm-5.247%
  • Debugging and code review

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads61%
    glm-5.258%
  • Agentic coding

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads64%
    glm-5.261%
  • Tool and function calling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads66%
    glm-5.255%
  • SQL and query writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-high61%
    glm-5.2Leads63%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads58%
    glm-5.244%
  • Professional writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads58%
    glm-5.251%
  • Conversational quality

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads65%
    glm-5.249%
  • Multilingual ability

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads99%
    glm-5.284%
  • Translation

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    glm-5.261%
  • Summarization

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads76%
    glm-5.257%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads75%
    glm-5.261%
  • Professional domains

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads66%
    glm-5.253%
  • Information extraction

    gemini-3.8-flash-high48%
    glm-5.2Leads61%
  • Classification and labeling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    glm-5.261%
  • Long-context handling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads89%
    glm-5.267%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemini-3.8-flash-high43%
    glm-5.2Leads53%
  • Structured output

    gemini-3.8-flash-high9%
    glm-5.2Leads60%
  • Factual accuracy

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads72%
    glm-5.250%
  • Safety and alignment

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads68%
    glm-5.245%
  • Steerability

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads51%
    glm-5.249%
  • Output consistency

    gemini-3.8-flash-high58%
    glm-5.2Leads60%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads87%
    glm-5.237%
  • Cost efficiency

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads75%
    glm-5.243%
  • Image understanding

    gemini-3.8-flash-high86%
    glm-5.2No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3.8-flash-high

95.32%

glm-5.2

99.94%

Average response time

gemini-3.8-flash-high

13,827.75 ms

glm-5.2

2,766.68 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3.8-flash-high

60,000 ms

glm-5.2

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 85.7%glm-5.2: 100%
24 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 20,426 msglm-5.2: 666 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 60,000 msglm-5.2: 5,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gemini-3.8-flash-high has a larger context window.
  • gemini-3.8-flash-high supports image input while the other model does not.
  • glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring