glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vsgpt-5.6-terra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.2
976,000 tokens
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
Input formats
glm-5.2
text
gpt-5.6-terra
text, image
Vision
glm-5.2
Not supported
gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
glm-5.2 · leads in 1
56%
Moderate
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 28
83%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
glm-5.250%gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%Logical reasoning
glm-5.257%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%Mathematics
glm-5.262%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Scientific and technical depth
glm-5.256%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%Planning and task decomposition
glm-5.257%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Coding & tools
Code generation
glm-5.247%gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%Debugging and code review
glm-5.258%gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%Agentic coding
glm-5.261%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Tool and function calling
glm-5.255%gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%SQL and query writing
glm-5.263%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Writing & language
Creative writing
glm-5.244%gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%Professional writing
glm-5.251%gpt-5.6-terraLeads84%Conversational quality
glm-5.249%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%Multilingual ability
glm-5.2Leads84%gpt-5.6-terra81%Translation
glm-5.261%gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%Summarization
glm-5.257%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
glm-5.261%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%Professional domains
glm-5.253%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%Information extraction
glm-5.261%gpt-5.6-terraLeads91%Classification and labeling
glm-5.261%gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%Long-context handling
glm-5.267%gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
glm-5.253%gpt-5.6-terraLeads83%Structured output
glm-5.260%gpt-5.6-terraLeads89%Factual accuracy
glm-5.250%gpt-5.6-terraLeads82%Safety and alignment
glm-5.245%gpt-5.6-terraLeads74%Steerability
glm-5.249%gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%Output consistency
glm-5.260%gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
glm-5.237%gpt-5.6-terraLeads44%Cost efficiency
glm-5.243%gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%Image understanding
glm-5.2No image inputgpt-5.6-terra59%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
99.94%
gpt-5.6-terra
93.73%
Average response time
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
29,135.19 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 100%gpt-5.6-terra: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 666 msgpt-5.6-terra: 17,864 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 5,000 msgpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-terra has a larger context window.
- gpt-5.6-terra supports image input while the other model does not.
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.